Alberta Premier Danielle Smith is calling on Ottawa to act after the Supreme Court of Canada struck down mandatory minimum sentences for child-sexual-related offences, calling the decision a threat to community safety and trust in the justice system.
The court ruled that certain mandatory minimum penalties for the offence of child luring are unconstitutional because they could lead to punishment that is “grossly disproportionate” in some cases. The decision removes sentencing minimums meant to ensure jail time for people convicted of luring or possessing child pornography.
Smith said the ruling sends the wrong message and undermines protections for victims.
“The possession of child pornography is a heinous crime, and even a one-year minimum sentence is already far too lenient,” she said. “This decision is outrageous. We call on the federal government to immediately invoke the notwithstanding clause of the Constitution and overturn this ruling to ensure the protection of our children.”
The court’s reasoning focused on the broad scope of the luring offence, which can include online communication through various platforms. Smith rejected that explanation, saying it excuses behaviour that endangers children.
She said her government will work with Alberta’s justice system and child-protection partners to close any gaps created by the ruling. That includes reviewing legislation, tightening oversight, and pressing Ottawa to take immediate action.
“Alberta will not stand idle,” Smith said. “We owe it to every parent and every child in this province to have a justice system that works. Today’s decision puts that duty at risk.”
